LP Due Diligence: How to Prepare Your DDQ
ILPA DDQ 2.0, key sections LPs focus on, and common mistakes that kill deals
Quick Answer
DDQ preparation guide for fund managers: ILPA DDQ 2.0 structure, key sections LPs scrutinize, common mistakes, and data room best practices.
When an LP gets serious about your fund, they send a Due Diligence Questionnaire—a 100-300 question document that covers everything from investment process to cybersecurity policies. Your DDQ response is often the make-or-break document in the allocation process. A sloppy, incomplete, or evasive DDQ kills more deals than bad performance. This guide shows you how to prepare a DDQ that moves you forward.
The DDQ is where deals die
A 200+ question DDQ is overwhelming for a first-time GP who has never completed one
Generic, copy-paste answers signal laziness and trigger deeper scrutiny
Missing or incomplete sections suggest operational immaturity
Inconsistencies between the DDQ, pitch deck, and verbal answers raise immediate red flags
Most GPs prepare their DDQ reactively—scrambling to complete it after an LP requests it
What is a DDQ
A Due Diligence Questionnaire is a standardized document that LPs use to evaluate a fund manager across every dimension: investment strategy, team, track record, operations, legal structure, compliance, and ESG practices. Think of it as the comprehensive exam for your fund.
Why LPs use DDQs
DDQs provide a structured, comparable framework for evaluating managers. They ensure LPs cover all critical areas, create a paper trail for investment committee approval, and allow junior analysts to screen managers before senior team time is invested.
When the DDQ comes in the process
Typically after an initial meeting or two. An LP sending you a DDQ is a positive signal—it means they're interested enough to invest diligence time. But the DDQ is a gate: a strong response advances you to deeper diligence; a weak one ends the process.
Standard vs custom DDQs
Many LPs use the ILPA DDQ 2.0 template, which has become the industry standard. Others use custom questionnaires tailored to their specific evaluation criteria. Having a complete ILPA DDQ ready allows you to respond quickly and adapt sections for custom requests.
ILPA DDQ 2.0 structure
The Institutional Limited Partners Association (ILPA) Due Diligence Questionnaire 2.0 is the most widely used template. Understanding its structure helps you prepare proactively rather than reactively.
Firm overview and history
Founding story, ownership structure, office locations, AUM evolution, and organizational chart. This section sets the context for everything that follows. Be precise about ownership percentages, team composition, and firm evolution.
Investment strategy and process
Detailed description of how you source, evaluate, execute, manage, and exit investments. LPs want to understand your edge, decision-making process, and how portfolio construction works. Vague descriptions like "we find great companies" get flagged immediately.
Track record and attribution
Historical returns with deal-level detail, attribution of returns to specific decisions, and comparison to relevant benchmarks. For first-time managers, track record from prior firms must be carefully documented with clear attribution methodology.
Team and compensation
Bios, roles, carry allocation, compensation structure, retention mechanisms, and succession planning. LPs assess whether the team is stable, properly incentivized, and has a plan for key-person departures.
Operations and compliance
Fund administrator, auditor, legal counsel, compliance officer, valuation policy, cybersecurity measures, and business continuity planning. This section separates institutional-quality managers from those who aren't ready for institutional capital.
ESG and responsible investing
Environmental, social, and governance policies, integration into the investment process, and reporting commitments. Increasingly important—many LPs screen out managers without formal ESG policies.
Key sections LPs focus on
While every section of the DDQ matters, experienced allocators spend disproportionate time on specific areas that reveal the most about a manager's quality.
Track record attribution
LPs drill into which returns you personally generated vs. inherited from a team or platform. "I was on the deal team" is very different from "I led the investment." Be honest about your role and contribution—experienced allocators will verify through references.
Key-person provisions and succession
Who are the key people, and what happens if they leave? LPs want to see thoughtful key-person clauses in fund documents and evidence of junior team development. A fund dependent on a single individual is a concentration risk.
Valuation policy and methodology
How do you value portfolio companies? Do you use independent third-party valuations? How often? Aggressive marking of portfolio companies in the DDQ is a red flag that triggers deeper scrutiny of every return number you've presented.
Fee structure and expenses
Full transparency on management fees, carry structure, fund expenses charged to LPs, and any portfolio company fees. Post-ILPA fee transparency standards, evasive fee disclosures are disqualifying for many institutional LPs.
Common DDQ mistakes
These mistakes are surprisingly common and have outsized negative impact on how LPs perceive your fund.
Inconsistencies across documents
If your DDQ says Fund I is $100M target but your deck says $75-125M, that inconsistency gets flagged. LPs compare every document you've provided. One analyst at a pension fund told us they found 3+ inconsistencies in 40% of DDQs they received.
Leaving questions blank or saying "N/A"
Blank answers suggest you either can't or won't answer. Even if a question doesn't apply, explain why briefly. "N/A—this is our first institutional fund so we do not have prior LP references, but we can provide professional references from prior employers" is better than just "N/A."
Overly promotional language
The DDQ is a diligence document, not a marketing brochure. Phrases like "world-class team" and "unparalleled track record" trigger skepticism. Use specific, verifiable facts instead of superlatives.
Not having a DDQ ready when asked
When an LP asks for your DDQ and you say "we're still working on it," it signals that you're not ready for institutional capital. Have a complete DDQ prepared before you start fundraising—not after the first LP requests one.
Preparing your data room
The DDQ response is typically accompanied by a virtual data room with supporting documents. A well-organized data room demonstrates operational maturity.
Essential documents
PPM (Private Placement Memorandum), LPA (Limited Partnership Agreement), subscription agreement, audited financials (if applicable), compliance manual, cybersecurity policy, ESG policy, and team bios/resumes.
Track record support
Deal-level performance data, cash flow schedules, attribution analysis, and any third-party performance verification. For track records from prior firms, include written consent from the prior employer to share the data.
Organization and access
Use a professional VDR (Intralinks, Datasite, or even a well-organized Google Drive). Label everything clearly, organize by DDQ section, and control access permissions. A messy data room signals a messy operation.
Find LPs before they ask for your DDQ
Before you can submit a DDQ, you need to get the meeting. LPbacked gives you direct access to 19,000+ LP contacts so you can build a pipeline of prospects who will eventually request your DDQ.
Direct contact data for LP investment team members
Filter by LP type, geography, AUM, and sector
19,000+ LPs across 133 countries
Verified email addresses and phone numbers
Export to CSV for CRM integration
Plans from $99/month—start outreach immediately
Cancel anytime.
Frequently asked questions
What is a DDQ in private equity?
A Due Diligence Questionnaire (DDQ) is a comprehensive document that LPs send to fund managers during the evaluation process. It covers investment strategy, team, track record, operations, compliance, and ESG practices. The ILPA DDQ 2.0 is the industry-standard template and typically contains 100-300 questions across 10+ sections.
How long should a DDQ response be?
A complete DDQ response is typically 50-100 pages depending on the template and your fund's complexity. Quality matters more than length. Be thorough but concise—LP analysts review dozens of DDQs and appreciate clear, direct answers over verbose ones.
When should I prepare my DDQ?
Before you start fundraising. Your DDQ should be complete and reviewed by your fund counsel before your first LP meeting. When an LP requests your DDQ, you should be able to send it within 24-48 hours. Being able to respond quickly signals institutional readiness.
What is the ILPA DDQ 2.0?
The ILPA DDQ 2.0 is a standardized due diligence questionnaire template published by the Institutional Limited Partners Association. It covers firm overview, investment strategy, track record, team, operations, compliance, ESG, and fund terms. Most institutional LPs use it as their baseline template, sometimes with additional custom questions.
Can I use my DDQ response for multiple LPs?
Yes—that's one of the benefits of having a thorough ILPA DDQ completed. About 70-80% of questions are consistent across LP questionnaires. Maintain a "master DDQ" that you customize for each LP, adjusting specific answers to address their particular concerns or custom questions.
What are the biggest red flags in a DDQ?
Inconsistencies between the DDQ and other materials (pitch deck, verbal discussions), vague descriptions of investment process, missing operational infrastructure (no fund administrator, no independent auditor), overly promotional language, blank or "N/A" answers without explanation, and lack of a formal valuation policy.